Industrial Hygiene in Construction

If you’ve ever won an award before, sometimes getting the award rarely equates to anything lasting (other than your increased ego). However, in construction nowadays, safety awards are HUGE! This is especially true if you are competitive bidding (or plan to in the future). I know companies who have received jobs & project  based upon one (or several) safety awards they have won. Of course they had other things going for them, but the safety award was the tipping point.

I am talking about company safety awards, not safety awards for being safe (see my earlier post, about safety incentives).

I really don’t think it matters where you get the award.

• Could be a OSHA SHARP, OSHA VPP, a regional/local conference (here’s an example, and here),
• an association award for safety (AGC, CURT, ABC),
• an insurance award (workers comp, your general liability carrier),
• safety program award,
• trade association (HVAC, Landscape, Union) or go for
• Safety non-profit (National Safety Council), ASSE, local section, or
• LEED and sustainability award (I know, not exactly safety-related).

Heck, create your own award! If you’re a GC, or a specialty contractor, why not give awards to your subcontractors or general contractors if they do an amazing safety work, or provide innovation? Print off your own certificates. Or, at the end of your project, ask your owner/GC if they will recommend and/or give you an award for the safe work you’ve performed.

Here’s an example of a construction website’s awards: Russell, James (no connections). Here’s a similar article from EHS Today.

On one hand it makes perfect sense. If you work safely, over time, this is something that should be rewarded. Many, many companies provide a safety-incentive for no/low work place injuries.  However, there is a downside, which some people have discovered:  If you reward people for being safe, there is a possibility they won’t tell you if something isn’t safe. It’s called a reporting bias, or selective reporting.

Unfortunately this bias is exactly the opposite of what the best companies do. The best companies report every little thing (every incident). People who scrutinize the numbers can tell you for every accident that occurs, there are usually 100 little incidents which occurred prior to the accident. The reporting of incidents is the best indicator for future accidents. (aka, catch phrase: leading indicators)

A really cool example of this is Google Dengue Trends. Dengue is a mosquito-spread virus. Google looks at search words and, over time & many data points, can actually see people where the fever is spreading. An article in Science & Tech (June, 2001 Graham Smith) “Google launches Dengue Trends tool to help doctors track spread of deadly fever”

So how do you motivate people to report an unsafe act?

Here are some ideas:

• Pre task planning & post task wrap-up (downside: can be a lot of paperwork)
• Check the first-aid safety box for what’s being used
• Encouraging open communication
• Spies (not my favorite)
• Follow up on any report of near miss (by management within a certain time frame)
• Reward the reporting of incidents
• Make it easy, safe, convenient, rewarding, honorable, and validating

Or, maybe you should ask the opposite question: What would motivate someone NOT to tell you? In construction, it is common practice to provide a bonus at the end of a project based upon various factors. This most definitely includes profitability, but it can also include safety. If you didn’t hurt anyone on the project, you SHOULD be rewarded. (or, at least be given a pat on the back). Here’s a case of someone who really got it backwards: A former safety manager at the Shaw Group (formerly Stone & Webster Construction) falsified records.

AIHA has released (2013) a white paper for guidelines on skills & competencies in silica specific to construction. It is a great outline for training your employees.

Some interesting points:

• Respiratory protection, and their respective assigned protection factor is mentioned. (Are you wearing the right respirator?)
• There is no mention of air sampling. Thank you. You do not need air sampling every-time, we already know it’s hazardous.
• They emphasize control measures for silica.

Another recent publication from IRSST in Canada explains the effectiveness of controls with regard to specific tools and where exposures are found in the industry. It has a lot of information, but if you are looking for the best method to control dust with a certain tool, it would be worthwhile to read the 108 page document.

The best resource for silica is silica-safe.org. You can create a plan for controlling it here. They have a database of tools & controls. Very handy. Someday soon we may see 3D printers able to make these dust controls and adapters for us at a moments notice. Until then, pre plan your task.

So, while standing in the California jet-way waiting to board my plane, I noticed this sign. It was most likely a Proposition 65 labeling warning. However, what in the world do you do with that information? How did posting that sign change any behavior? Could I have done anything different to avoid the jet fumes?

It reads, “Warning. Chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects and other reproductive harm are present in the jet engine exhaust fumes from jet fuel, and exhaust from equipment used to service airplanes. Sometimes these chemicals enter this jet bridge.”

In much the same way, sometimes our warning to employees is pointless. What can they do different? What is the point of telling them something if there is nothing we can do different?

The global harmonization system (GHS) is being implemented in the US by the end of 2013. By 2014 you must train your employees on the new changes to the (Material) Safety Data Sheets (SDS, now). (BTW, there are also some other things you must do).

The message I am trying to make (double irony, I know) is when you are training your employees, how do you measure the effectiveness  If they “sign in and say they were in your training”, were you effective? Here are some suggestions, which might help to measure the right thing:

• Questions. This ___ number of the audience asked ___ questions.
• Feedback. I received ____ # of suggestions for the next training.
• Changes. They are going to implement ____ changes to their workplace.
• Secondary labeling. (GHS specific, of course) While walking around the site, I noticed ____ secondary labels with the new labeling pictographs.

I admit these aren’t the-best-suggestions-ever. But, warning someone without an alternative, method to change, or way to adopt a change, is really pointless.

This type of potential exposure usually doesn’t cross my mind. Luckily, the specifications in the construction project (and the obvious towers nearby), alerted us to the hazard.

If employees are working near areas of potential high electromagnetic (EM) activity, you should do something (see below). High EM potential areas are power lines, cellular towers, TV/Radio broadcast sites, etc. We have all heard the dangers of living under high voltage power lines, and this is essentially the same concern: Non-ionizing radiation.

The FCC has a guidance document OET-65 (radio frequency) which has some recommended limits, called maximum permissible exposures (MPE). These limits vary depending on the frequency range and how close/what type of work you are doing nearby. OSHA (1910.97) has some guidance (based upon an old ANSI standard) and the ACGIH also has recommended limits. New research is ongoing due to the increased use, and the future demand, of cell phones. The clearest guidance is from IEEE (C95 radio frequency). They provide recommendations and a sample plan. But, to summarize:

• look for the source (s) of the radiation (sometimes it’s not obvious)
• take measurements (might be difficult, unless you have access to a field intensity meter) Ask the FCC?
• determine risk potential
• make a plan
  • develop controls – time & distance are easiest 
  • consider off-hours/ shut down of towers (in extreme cases)
• train
• consider:
  • cranes, large pieces of equipment that may resonate with a certain frequency
  • heat from stored energy
  • nondescript symptoms, which is usually the first sign of a problem

This is a somewhat new field (no pun). But, remember when power lines, cell towers, and tv/radio stations were installed. – The goal wasn’t to keep these away from people, it was to bring them closer. How close should we get? I’d love to hear if anyone has been dealing with this a lot in construction.

I had the opportunity to attend a construction safety award presentation and listen to various commercial construction companies (GC, and Specialty Contractors) explain why their company deserved an award. Owners, CEOs, Safety Directors, and Employees spoke about their company. Their stories were amazing. Below I have listed some of the ideas that inspired me. They may not, at first glace, appear to be amazing. However, consider when the CEO tells a story that makes him cry, or when a superintendent explains how he is part of a family,…. it makes the words ring different.

Here are my takeaways:

• Safety really starts at the top. It’s not a priority, it’s a core value. Check out the Injury Free Forum (IIF).
  • This is basically a club/meeting for CEOs to gather and talk about how to prevent injuries. It’s ‘almost’ an invite-only type of event. But, if you’re a CEO/President you should think about it. (helps if you live in the NE part of the US)
  • Here are some companies participating, Gilbane, Gilbane video (yep, it’s good), JMJ Associates, Baker Concrete video
• During initial employee orientation;
  • one company has each employee write a letter to their family saying (apologizing) why they are gone/dead. This really emphasizes to each individual why they need to work safe.
  • the CEO gives each new employee his business card and tell them to call him directly if they are asked to do something unsafe.
  • each new employee is assigned a mentor (the time period varies from 2 weeks to 1 month) to watch them work safely.
• Each employee has the right to stop work due to safety. If they do it: the CEO/President writes them a personal thank you note.
• Make each near miss a incident, but do NOT have a lot of paperwork, just simple documentation for future learning.
• Have a innovative idea challenge at your company for good safety ideas.
  • Put a bar code on infrequently used tools. Link to a short video which explains how to use it.
  • Zip tie PPE onto the tools upon checkout.
• Send your “Safety Incident” or “Safety Summary” to their home. Ask them to put it on their fridge. Then, run a contest. Randomly find a name & call that employee to see if they can tell you what the safety topic is. Give a prize. Repeat.
• Look at the design. A large GC mandated that every hole in their project have safety netting installed during the concrete pour. …and they did it!
• An electrical firm uses no knives. None. Think that helps cut down on injuries? (pun intended)

The goal is zero injuries. So, what happens after zero injuries? How about sending your spouse to work…and they come home healthier! It’s not far away for some companies, Health & Wellness programs are already being implemented. For whom are you working? Here’s one of my reasons:

Much research has been done in construction safety. If you are working in construction, you have probably heard the facts over and over. The majority of construction injuries are from four main hazards, hence the “focus four hazards“. Although this site is for health issues & industrial hygiene in construction, it would be ridiculous to NOT mention these other hazards.

• Falls,
• Caught-in or Caught-between,
• Struck-by &
• Electrocution.

When talking with superintendents and safety coordinators, you can usually tell very quickly  if they have these under control. Either their subcontractors already do it right, or if/when they see an error, they immediately stop and address the inefficiency.

I saw this ladder in front of my children’s school. There was no one around and, by the look of it, there might have been someone on the roof. I should have waited, or fixed the ladder and spoken to the individual. But, I didn’t. Instead, I took a picture, put it on the internet, and now I’m telling everyone why it’s wrong.

Reviewing a material safety data sheet (MSDS), or soon to be called a SDS (safety data sheet), can be a useful skill. Most times the product is straightforward and gives you what you need. However, there are somethings to watch for and areas to focus to make your reviewing skills better.

To start,  make sure you have the right SDS. Match the product with the form. If is is not exactly right, find the right one. It must list the model/product name & manufacturer.

Below are some suggestions:

• What is the date of the SDS?
  • is it the most recent?
  • when was it last updated?
• Look at section 2/3 (Hazardous components) VERY carefully.
  • google the CAS# and find the name (they sometimes hide the true-name)
  • look at the % of each component
  • what is the listed exposure limit? Is it correct? What about other recommended limits?
  • remember the hazard is only listed in this area if it is greater than 1% of the total
• Look through each section mindful of how you will be using the product.
  • for example: if you are going to be burning the product, usually the SDS will not address these types of concerns/exposures
  • what are the required PPE during “regular use”
  • what happens if you use this product in a confined area?
  • does the manufacturer recommend air monitoring? when?
• Familiarize yourself with the emergency procedures
  • what if it spills?
  • disposal?
  • what can cause exposure? inhalation? skin?
• Look at the other sections with a inquisitive eye
  • do they list other chemicals, which are NOT included in the product section? why?
  • do they mention Proposition 65?
• Finally,
  • post/make available a copy wherever it’s needed
  • make sure you know the product

It is a mixed-bag when it comes to the quality of SDS from a manufacturer. Some of them will work with you, others are a total-pain. Remember it is YOUR RIGHT to know about the products you use. If you don’t feel comfortable with the information they’ve given you, call them. OR, go find another product.

Since you are reading this, you probably know the answer. Everyone. But, who is everyone? It should include your CEO/Company President/COO (or similar). If not, I guarantee you aren’t working as safely as possible.

The reason:  The person doing the work usually isn’t involved in the bidding & planning of the project.  It’s not always the President’s fault that the proper safety equipment wasn’t bought, or there are no available tie off points on the roof. (But, it might be their fault if they are willing to press forward without making changes.)

Here is one way to deal with these issues. Train the CEO (President/COO/Project Manager/Estimator) beforehand. Here’s how:

• Make the training for them. 
  • Don’t talk about safety harnesses, or the three different types of asbestos.
  • Go over big items (where are your claims? what are similar claims for your industry?)
• Emphasize the proper methods to control any hazard:
  • #1 engineering controls
  • #2 administrative controls
  • #3 PPE (in that order!)
• Get them to contact you during the bidding process (not after you’ve won it). Talk about what might be dangerous work & plan for it.
• Share a success story. Ask a superintendent to explain how they controlled a possible exposure.
  • Did they make the architect install in a tie-off point?
  • Did they ask the owner to change adhesive products to a less hazardous one?
  • Did they use an abatement contractor who performed the work well?
• Keep it simple & short. You don’t need a lot of time, but you do need them all on the same page.

When everyone in the company has the same interest in safety, it isn’t hard to explain.

NIOSH has just recommended a new exposure limit (REL) for hexavalent chromium. The new limit is 0.2 ug/m3 as an 8-hour TWA. If you remember, the OSHA PEL is 2.5 ug/m3 (8-hour TWA). SO, if you’re good at math, you can see this is A LOT lower.

The reasoning for this level is they have found a lung cancer risk (get this) EVEN AT 0.2 ug/m3. They recommend bringing airborne levels below this limit for lung exposures.

As I’ve described before, exposures are not limited to just inhalation. Dermal contact is a big concern.

If you have any hexavalent chromium at your facility, or stainless steel (welding, welding2, hardfacing, etc.) you need to do more than just air sampling. You need a comprehensive program including wipe samples, medical monitoring, etc. This may not be a specific OSHA rule for your facility.  However, these exposures are something you must manage.